Proposed title: Situated Design: A Three-Session Workshop for Inclusive Curatorial Practice
As part of the preparation for the MA GDC WIP Show, I propose a three-session workshop series titled Situated Design, designed to embed inclusive learning into the curatorial process of exhibition design. This intervention addresses the diversity of student perspectives, positionalities, and research contexts by making the exhibition process itself a shared learning opportunity.
The workshop will guide students through (1) infrastructural mapping of their research in relation to place, people, and systems; (2) collaborative spatial prototyping of shared zones; and (3) developing a ‘living’ presence for each zone through participatory acts like prompts, live programming, or publishing. Each step emphasizes inclusion: ensuring every voice is situated, heard, and considered in how we collectively shape the exhibition.
The diversity considered includes cultural background, communication style, access needs, research context, and personal identity. These differences are often flattened in traditional design displays. By situating knowledge relationally—rather than through dominant narratives of polished outcomes—we enable a more equitable platform for students to shape how their work is received.
The idea builds on participatory design principles and inclusive pedagogies such as “designing with, not for.” It is directly linked to my teaching context at UAL, where students come from wide-ranging geographies and disciplines, and often feel detached from exhibition-making processes driven by institutional or aesthetic norms.
Potential questions to reflect on:
Agency – Who holds curatorial authorship over what gets shown and how? How do we maintain openness while ensuring clarity and coherence?
Tone – If the format becomes too systematic or templated, does it risk becoming rigid or forced? How can structure enable rather than limit expression?
Equity – Are all students equally supported in expressing their research context? Whose voices or practices might unintentionally be marginalised?
Autonomy – How can individual approaches be maintained within a shared spatial and conceptual framework?
Next Steps: Collect feedback from students on the draft session plans, refine prompts for each zone, and liaise with staff and technical teams to support spatial and material resources.

Notes to references:
1.0 Spatial Practices
The actual way people use and move through space in their daily lifestyle.
- Fry, Tony, & Eleni Kalantidou. (2015). Design in the Borderlands. Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge.
- Campos, Marissa Renee. (2017). Queering Architecture: Appropriating Space and Process (MA thesis). School of Architecture and Interior Design, College of Design, Architecture, Art and Planning, University of Cincinnati.
- Flesler, Griselda, Anja Neidhardt, and Maya Ober: “A Conversation on the Discomfort of Feminist Design Pedagogy.” In Design Struggles: Intersecting Histories, Pedagogies and Perspectives, edited by Claudia Mareis, Nina Paim et al., 205–225. Amsterdam: Valiz.
- Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell.
Available at: https://monoskop.org/images/7/75/Lefebvre_Henri_The_Production_of_Space.pdf - Cresswell, T. (2015). Place: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
2.0 Representation of the Space
The maps, plans, the design — all abstract visual languages used to capture and represent the space.
- De Keersmaeker, A.T., Mees, M., Aerts, J.-M. & Garbin, C. (2023). EXIT ABOVE – after the tempest / d’après la tempête / naar de storm. [Dance performance] Rosas. Premiered 31 May 2023 at Théâtre National Wallonie-Bruxelles, Brussels.
Available at: https://www.rosas.be/en/productions/953-exit-above—after-the-tempest-d-apres-la-tempete-naar-de-storm - Conditional Design (n.d.). Conditional Design Workbook. [online] Available at: https://conditionaldesign.org/ [Accessed 27 May 2025].
3.0 Engaged / Situated Space
Spaces that are infused with our emotions, memories, and meaning — entangled with lived experience, identity, and context.
- Haraway, Donna J. (1988). “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
- Abdulla, Danah. (2018). Design Otherwise: Towards a Locally-centric Design Education Curricula in Jordan (Ph.D. dissertation). Goldsmiths, University of London.
- Escobar, Arturo. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. (2003). Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
I have found reading your intervention incredibly helpful when thinking about my own. I am currently bogged down in research (which I am really enjoying) and don’t feel I have achieved the level of clarity you demonstrate here in terms of practical application.
Facilitation of student agency in the curation and display of their work is not, in my experience, fostered at UAL. I am excited to watch this intervention unfold and believe it could be applicable across design schools. I teach on a design course at LCC with a cohort of 130 students, and exhibition displays are often determined by individual students’ ability to meet upload deadlines, respond to emails on time, and the scale of their work. This perpetuates harmful structures, including the marginalisation of neurodiverse students who experience time blindness, and those with unequal access to the monetary and material resources required to produce certain types of work.
I would be interested to know if you share this experience, and whether your intervention might extend to the making of work/administration required ahead of exhibition?
I believe your intervention will also enable students to build valuable skills related to their communication strategy, and to consider how the exhibition of work becomes part of this.
I look forward to seeing your bibliography in due course and the rich resources you’re pulling from!
During the recent tutorial, my tutor Linda highlighted the need to more clearly articulate how student responses will be recorded, tested, and evaluated throughout the intervention. While the proposal outlines a thoughtful and inclusive workshop structure, the current version lacks a plan for capturing how students engage with each session and how their feedback will inform iterative development. Moving forward, I will incorporate a structured approach to evaluating the impact of each session—this includes designing simple feedback tools (e.g., short prompts, visual mapping, or reflective check-ins), documenting outcomes, and testing key aspects of the intervention in a live setting. This will allow me to revise the proposal over time (Version 1, 2, etc.), demonstrate how student input is shaping the process, and include these developments in an appendix of outcomes. By building this feedback loop into the structure, I aim to ensure the intervention remains responsive and adaptive to student needs while evidencing its impact clearly in the final report.